St. Maarten can hold referendums, but legal framework still missing, Wescot-Williams explains

GREAT BAY--Although St. Maarten's Constitution allows for referendums, the country still lacks the national ordinance needed to regulate how they are conducted, President of Parliament Sarah Wescot-Williams has pointed out.

The MP, who personally initiated legislation to establish the necessary framework, says the proposed ordinance is now moving through the legislative process and remains essential if government or Parliament is to formally consult the population on matters of national importance.

Wescot-Williams addressed the issue during an October 12 panel discussion on the Constitution, organized by Wendell Moore and the PMIA, where she renewed her call for referendum legislation and explained the constitutional provisions governing public participation in national decision-making.

The President of Parliament emphasized that while referendums are often associated with decisions concerning St. Maarten's constitutional status, their potential use extends to other matters affecting the country.

“While we often think of referendums in terms of our constitutional status, I value the instrument of a referendum as a constitutional tool to hear the population on any matter of great national importance,” Wescot-Williams stated.

She explained that the Constitution provides for consultative referendums, meaning that their purpose is to determine the views of the population on a particular issue rather than automatically produce a legally binding decision.

Such referendums would allow government and Parliament to formally seek public opinion before determining how to proceed on important national matters.

However, Wescot-Williams stressed that the initiative to organize a referendum must come from government or Parliament. It is the responsibility of these institutions to determine when an issue warrants direct consultation with the population.

She also explained that a referendum should not be confused with a petition, which serves a different purpose under the Constitution and Parliament's Rules of Order.

Petitions provide citizens with an avenue to submit grievances to Parliament or propose legislative changes affecting their interests. However, submitting a petition does not automatically initiate a referendum or require Parliament to organize one.

The MP pointed out that although the constitutional foundation for referendums already exists, the absence of implementing legislation means the practical procedures for conducting them remain incomplete.

“Until the ordinance is in place, the practical mechanism for holding a referendum remains incomplete. The draft now before Parliament is intended to close that gap by setting out how referendums are to be conducted.”

Wescot-Williams indicated that the draft ordinance she initiated is intended to provide the necessary legal framework for organizing consultative referendums, allowing the constitutional provision to be implemented in practice.

Beyond the referendum discussion, the October 12 panel also examined the broader importance of St. Maarten's Constitution and the need for greater public understanding of the country's democratic institutions.

Wescot-Williams, who played a leading role in the constitutional process that resulted in St. Maarten attaining country status on October 10, 2010, reflected on the significance of that transition and the responsibilities that came with it.

She explained that the Constitution, developed following the 2000 referendum, serves as a social contract establishing the country's democratic structure, the rights of citizens and the responsibilities of those exercising public authority.

The discussion also highlighted the difference between St. Maarten's Constitution and the Charter for the Kingdom of the Netherlands. While the Charter regulates relations among the countries of the Kingdom, the Constitution governs St. Maarten's own democratic institutions and internal affairs.

The role of the Constitutional Court was also addressed, particularly its responsibility for reviewing legislation to ensure compliance with the Constitution.

Another important theme was civic education. The panel emphasized that residents who understand the Constitution, the responsibilities of Parliament and the functions of government are better equipped to participate in democratic processes and hold elected representatives accountable.

Reflecting on the constitutional changes of October 10, 2010, Wescot-Williams recalled that St. Maarten's transition to country status removed a layer of administration and placed responsibility for its internal affairs directly with the country's own institutions under its Constitution.

‍