Papiamentu: After all these years, why now?

Davika Bissessar-Shaw
September 17, 2026
Share this post

On September 16, 2026, the Public Body Bonaire (OLB) announced a step toward establishing a Language Institute for Bonaire to strengthen Papiamentu in education, government and society. Protecting Papiamentu is important, but the announcement also raises serious questions about timing, responsibility and what has happened in the years leading up to this point.

Why now, and why has it taken so long? Papiamentu did not suddenly become important in 2026. It has been carried from generation to generation by the people of Bonaire and remains central to the island’s history, culture and identity. Yet OLB now states that the ambition is that from 2030 no child will leave school without being literate in Papiamentu.

That target immediately raises another question: why 2030? What about the generations of Bonairean children who passed through the education system before then? Why was literacy in their own language not already adequately guaranteed? This is not simply a language-policy question. It is also a human-rights question.

Article 13 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights recognizes the right to education, while Article 15 recognizes the right to participate in cultural life. Language is inseparable from both. The issue must also be viewed through the fundamental principles contained in Article 73 of the United Nations Charter, which states that for peoples who have not yet attained a full measure of self-government, the interests of the inhabitants are paramount.

Article 73 further requires attention to their political, economic, social and educational advancement, with due respect for their culture and with account taken of their political aspirations. These are fundamental principles that speak directly to the protection of a people’s identity, culture, education and development.

For Bonaire, this raises a basic and unavoidable question: were the language, culture and educational interests of the Bonairean people adequately protected throughout the political changes that transformed the island? That question becomes even more important when the recent record is examined.

In 2021, OLB and the Dutch government entered into a governance agreement concerning Papiamentu. In January 2024, stronger protection for Papiamentu on Bonaire under the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages came into effect. In May 2024, the Dutch government announced €1 million for the protection and promotion of Papiamentu on Bonaire, and government information later indicated that OLB intended to use additional financial support toward establishing a Language Institute.

Now, more than two years later, another “important step” is being announced. So where do matters actually stand? How much of the €1 million has been received and spent? What was achieved with those funds? Why has establishing the institute taken until 2026?

There is also a more fundamental question about governance and control. Who will appoint the board and director of the Language Institute? Who will control its budget? Who will determine language standards and educational priorities? What authority will Bonairean teachers, linguists, writers, parents and cultural organizations have in shaping its direction?

A Language Institute for Bonaire cannot simply become another institution where decisions affecting Bonaireans are ultimately determined elsewhere. If the institute is truly intended to protect Papiamentu and strengthen cultural and educational rights, then Bonaireans must have a meaningful and substantive role in how it is governed.

The announcement should therefore not end the discussion. It should begin one. If previous education and language policies disadvantaged Papiamentu-speaking children or inadequately protected their cultural and educational rights, those consequences should be independently examined. Where human-rights violations are established, they should be acknowledged and remedied.

For generations, Bonaireans kept Papiamentu alive without waiting for an institute. Now government says institutional protection is necessary. The people therefore have every right to ask why now, why 2030, what happened during the previous decades, where the allocated money went, who will control the institute, and who will be held accountable if the rights of earlier generations were not adequately protected.

Papiamentu is not simply government policy. It is the cultural inheritance of the people of Bonaire, and its protection is a fundamental human-rights issue.

Share this post