Weak Agendas

Most people think the biggest problem in politics is the politician. Sometimes it is. But sometimes the problem is also the people around the politician, especially the ones who refuse to admit when he is getting it wrong. That is not easy to say, because nobody likes to think they are part of the problem. It is much easier to blame government, ministers, or Parliament and leave it there. But a country can also stay stuck because too many people have become comfortable defending what they should be questioning.

It usually starts the same way. A promise is made and never fulfilled. A project is announced, but months later there is little to show for it. A public concern is raised, but nothing is done. Under normal circumstances, people should be able to say plainly, this is not right. Instead, some supporters rush to excuse it. They say give him time. They say he means well. They say the other side was worse. And just like that, the standard begins to shift.

That is what weak agendas look like.

A weak agenda is when a citizen is more interested in defending a political side than defending what is right. It is when people wear their political colors so tightly that they can no longer look at a situation clearly. If their favorite politician makes a mistake, they search for an excuse before they search for the truth. If he underperforms, they lower the bar for him alone.

That hurts the country, but it also hurts the politician. No one gets better by being excused for everything. A politician who knows his supporters will defend him no matter what has little reason to improve. He may still speak well and sound convincing, but if he is not being honestly corrected, he is not being helped. He is being made comfortable, and too much comfort in public life is dangerous.

It also betrays the citizen’s duty to the wider community. Voting is only one part of citizenship. After that, the responsibility is to protect standards, not personalities. Politicians usually know who is in front of them. They know when people are paying attention, and they know when people are willing to accept almost anything. Once they see that gullibility, weak explanations and promises without delivery become enough. In that way, the public can end up helping to keep the very dysfunction it complains about alive.

The answer is not bitterness or attacking people for their views (read that again). The answer is fairness. Hold everyone to the same standard. If something is wrong, it is wrong no matter who did it. If a politician is failing, that should matter whether he belongs to your camp or not.

Holding your favorite politician accountable does not mean you have turned against him. It means you are reminding him why he was trusted in the first place, to act, to secure, to improve, and to elevate. Real loyalty is not blind defense. Real loyalty is expecting better.

You are not in a cult where your leaders expects to here "Heil!". You are a citizen of a country. And a country improves when its people stop protecting personalities and start protecting standards. That is how leaders get better. That is how the public does its part. And that is how a society begins to move forward.

‍